بررسی ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی مقیاس فرم کوتاه سلامت روان کامل

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری روانشناسی تربیتی ، دانشکده روانشناسی ،واحد گرمسار دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، گرمسار، ایران

2 دانشیار عصب روانشناسی، گروه روانشناسی، واحد گرمسار، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، گرمسار، ایران

3 استاد تمام گروه روانشناسی بالینی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

مقدمه: الگوی حالت کامل سلامت روان با استفاده از دو الگوی پزشکی و توانمندی‌ها، میزان سلامت روان افراد را بر اساس شدت علائم بیماری و نشانه‌های بهزیستی ارزیابی می‌کند. هدف مطالعه حاضر بررسی ویژگی‌های روانسنجی (پایایی و روایی) فرم کوتاه سلامت روان کامل و ارائه شواهد تجربی برای استفاده از نمره کل این مقیاس بود.
روش: این پژوهش یک مطالعه توصیفی - تحلیلی از نوع اعتبارسنجی بود. نمونه شامل ۶۰۰ نفر از دانشجو معلمان شهر تهران بودند که با روش نمونه‌گیری در دسترس انتخاب شدند و مقیاس سلامت روان کامل، مقیاس بهزیستی روانشناختی و سیاهه افسردگی
 بک - ۲ را تکمیل کردند.
نتایج:نتایج تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی وجود سه عامل را احراز کرد که در مجموع ۷۸۱/۶۱ درصد از واریانس کل مقیاس را تبیین می‌کنند. نتایج تحلیل عاملی تاییدی علاوه بر تایید نتایج حاصل از تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی، نشان داد که از میان الگوهای رقیب، الگوی بی‌فاکتور بهتر از سایر الگوها ساختار عاملی مقیاس را نشان می‌دهد و الگوی بی‌فاکتور به عنوان شاهد تجربی برای استفاده از نمره کل مقیاس پیشنهاد شد. پایایی مقیاس با دو روش آلفای کرونباخ و بازآزمایی به ترتیب ۸۴/۰ و ۸۲/۰ به دست آمدند.
بحث و نتیجه‌گیری: نتایج مطالعه نشان دادند که این مقیاس دارای ویژگی‌های روانسنجی مناسبی در گروه غیربالینی برخوردار است و می‌توان از نمره کل مقیاس نیز استفاده کرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating the Psychometric of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form Scale

نویسندگان [English]

  • Noorellah Yousefi 1
  • Alireza Pirkhaefi 2
  • Ahmad Borjali 3
چکیده [English]

Abstract
Introduction: Complete state model of mental health using two medical model and abilities model evaluates mental health based on the severity of symptoms and signs of well-being. The purpose of this study was to investigate the psychometric properties (reliability and validity) of the short form of complete mental health and provided empirical evidence for using the whole scale score. Method: This study was a descriptive-analytical study of validation type. The sample consisted of 600 teacher’s students from Tehran who were selected by available sampling method and completed the Complete Mental Health Scale, Psychological Well-being Scale and Beck Depression Inventory-II.
Results: The results of exploratory factor analysis revealed the existence of three factors that explained 61/781% of  total variance scale. Confirmatory factor analysis results in addition to confirming the results of exploratory factor analysis showed among competing models, the bi-factor model represents the scale factor structure better than other models and the bi-factor model was suggested as an experimental witness for using the total score scale. The reliability of the scale was obtained by Cronbach's alpha and retesting methods of 0.84 and 0.82, respectively.
Discussion and Conclusion: The results of this study showed that this scale has appropriate psychometric properties in the non-clinical group and the total score can be used.
Keywords: Well-being, Positive Mental Health, Mental Health Continuum Model, Reliability, Exploratory Factor Analysis, Confirmatory Factor Analysis
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Well-being
  • Positive Mental Health
  • Mental Health Continuum Model
  • Reliability
  • Exploratory Factor Analysis
  • Confirmatory Factor Analysis
 1- Lukat, J., Margraf, J., Lutz, R., van der Veld, W.M., & Becker, E.S. (2016). Psychometric properties of the Positive Mental Health Scale (PMH-scale). BMC Psychology, Vol4, N4: PP. 1-14. DOI 10.1186/s40359-016-0111-x
2- Keyes, C. L. M. (2002). The Mental Health Continuum: From languishing to flourishing in life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, Vol 43, N 2:PP.  207-222, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3090197
3-  World Health Organization. (2004). Promoting mental health: Concepts, emerging evidence, practice (Summary Report). Geneva: WHO.
4-  Keyes, C.L.M. (2005). Mental Illness and/or Mental Health? Investigating Axioms of the Complete State Model of Health. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Vol 73, N 3: PP. 539 –548. DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.73.3.539
5-  Keyes, C. L. M. (2006). Mental health in adolescence: Is America’s youth flourishing? American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, Vol 76, N 3:PP. 395-402.
6-  Keyes, C.LM. (2013). Mental Well-Being: International Contributions to the Study of Positive Mental Health. New York: Springer.
7-  Lamers, S. M. A. (2012). Positive mental health: Measurement, relevance and implications. Enschede, the Netherlands: University of Twente.
 
8- Frisch, M.B. (2013). Evidence-Based Well-Being/Positive Psychology Assessment and Intervention with Quality of Life Therapy and Coaching and the Quality of Life Inventory (QOLI). Soc Indic Res VOL 114: PP.193–227. DOI 10.1007/s11205-012-0140-7
9-  Lamers, S. M. A., Westerhof, G. J., Bohlmeijer, E. T., Ten Klooster, P. M., & Keyes, C. L. M. (2011). Evaluating the psychometric properties of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF). Journal of Clinical Psychology, Vol 6, N 1: PP. 99-110.
10-  Keyes, C. (2007). Promoting and protecting mental health as flourishing: A complementary strategy for improving national mental health. American Psychologist, VOL 62, N,2: PP. 95–108. doi.org/1.1037/0003-066X.62.2.95
11-  Seligman, M.E.P. (2005). Positive Psychology, Positive Prevention, and Positive Therapy. In C.R. Snyder & S.J. Lopez (eds), Handbook of Positive Psychology, London: Oxford University Press, pp (3-9).
12- Fredrickson, B. L. (2009). Positivity: Groundbreaking research reveals how to embrace the hidden strength of positive emotions, overcome negativity, and thrive. New York, NY: Crown Publishers.
13- Fredrickson, B. L. (2011). Positivity: Groundbreaking Research to Release Your Inner Optimist and Thrive. Oxford: Oneworld Publications.
14- Lyubomirsky, S., & Layous, K. (2013). How Do Simple Positive Activities Increase Well-Being? VOL 22, N1: PP. 57–62. DOI: 10.1177/0963721412469809
15-   Frisch, M. B. (2006). Quality of Life Therapy. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.
16-  Peterson, C., and Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character Strengths and Virtues: A Handbook and Classification. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
17-  Seligman, M. (2011). Flourish: A Visionary New Understanding of Happiness and Wellbeing. New York, NY: Free Press.
18-  Diener, E.D. (2009). Assessing Well-Being, The Collected Works of Ed Diener. New York: Springe. DOI 10.1007/978-90-481-2354-4.
19-  Ryff, C.D. (2017). Eudaimonic well-being, inequality, and health: Recent findings and future directions. Int Rev Econ, VOL 64: PP. 159–178. DOI 10.1007/s12232-017-0277-4
20-  Ryff, C.D., (1989). Happiness Is Everything, Or Is It? Explorations on the Meaning of Psychological Well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, VOL 57:PP. 1069–1081.
21-  Huppert, F. A., & So, T. C. (2013). Flourishing across Europe: Application of a new conceptual framework for defining well-being. Social Indicators Research, VOL 110, N 3: PP. 837-861. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9966-7
22-  Keyes, C. L. M. (1998). Social well-being. Social Psychology Quarterly. VOL 61: PP. 121-140..
23-  Keyes, C.L.M., & Waterman, M.B. (2003). Dimensions of well-being and mental health in adulthood. In: Bornstein M, Davidson L, Keyes CLM, Moore K, editors. editors Well-being: positive development across the life course. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, PP.477–97.
24- Keyes, C. (2007). Promoting and protecting mental health as flourishing: A complementary strategy for improving national mental health. American Psychologist, VOL  62, N2: PP. 95–108. doi.org/1.1037/0003-066X.62.2.95
25-  Keyes, C. L. M. (2009). The nature and importance of mental health in youth. In R. Gilman, M. Furlong, & E. S. Heubner (Eds.), Promoting Wellness in Children and Youth: A Handbook of Positive Psychology in the Schools (pp. 9-23). New York: Routledge.
26-  Matos, A.P., André, R.S., Cherpe, S., Rodrigues, D., Figueira, C., & Pinto, A.M. (2019). Estudo psicométrico preliminar da Mental Health Continuum – Short Form – for youthnuma amostra de adolescentes portugueses. mprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, VOL 17: PP.131-156.
27-  Foster, B.J., & Chow, G.M. (2019). Development of the Sport Mental Health Continuum—Short Form (Sport MHC-SF). Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology. VOL 13. PP.  1–16.
28-  Dostall, A. (2019). Validation of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form Revised in an English Speaking Student Population. [dissertation]. Twente University.
29- Silverman, A.L., Forgeard, M., Beard, C., Björgvinsson, T. (2018). Psychometric properties of the mental health continuum – short form in a psychiatric sample. Journal Well Being Assess, VOL 2, N 1: PP. 57–73.
30- Franken, K., Lamers, S.M.A., Ten Klooste, P.M., Bohlmeijer, E.T., & Westerhof, G. (2018). Validation of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form and the dual continua model of well-being and psychopathology in an adult mental health setting. Journal of Clinical Psychology, PP. 1-16. DOI: 10.1002/jclp.22659
31- Zemojtel-Piotrowska, M., Piotrowskim J. P.,Osin, E. N., Cieciuch, J., Adams, B. G., Ardi, R....Maltby, J. (2018). The mental health continuum-short form: the structure and application for cross-cultural studies-A 38 nation study. Journal of Clinical Psychology. VOL 74, N 6: PP. 1034-1052.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22570.
32- Bothma, E.M. (2018). The Mental Health Continuum-Short Form: Measurement invariance in a South African context. Mini-dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Masters of Arts in Positive Psychology at the Vaal Triangle Campus, North-West University.
33- Echeverría, G., Torres, M., Pedrals, N., Padilla, O., Rigotti, A., & Bitran, M. (2017). Validation of a Spanish Version of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form Questionnaire. Psicothema, VOL 29, N 1: PP. 96-102. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2016.3
34- Lupano Perugini, M. L., de la Iglesia, G., Castro Solano, A. & Keyes, C. L. M. (2017). The Mental Health ContinuumShort Form (MHC-SF) in the Argentinean Context: Confi rmatory Factor Analysis and Measurement Invariance. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, VOL 13, N 1: PP. 93-108. Doi: 10.5964/ejop.v13i1.1163
35- Schröder, M. (2017). The estimation of the psychometric properties of the MHC-SF for the broad South African organizational context. Master Thesis, Faculty of Behavioral Management & Social Science – BMS Positive Psychology & Technology (PPT): University of Twente Enschede.
36-  Rafiey, H., Alipour, F., LeBeau, R., Amini Rarani, M., Salimi, Y., & Ahmadi, S. (2017). Evaluating the psychometric properties of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF) in Iranian earthquake survivors, International Journal of Mental Health, VOL  46, N 3: PP. 243-251. DOI: 10.1080/00207411.2017.1308295
37- Carvalho, J. S., Salgado, P. N., Marquéz, P. A., & Maroco, J. (2016). Psychometric properties of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form: A study of Portuguese speaking children youths. Journal of Child and Family Studies, VOL  1: PP. 1-14. doi:1.1007/s10826-016-0396-7
38-  Hides, L., Quinn, C., Stoyanov, S., Cockshaw, W., Mitchell, T., & Kavanagh, D.J. (2016). Is the mental wellbeing of young Australians best represented by a single, multidimensional or bifactor model? Psychiatry Research, VOL 241: PP. 1-7.
39-  Petrillo, G., Capone, V., Caso, D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (2015). The Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF) as a measure of well-being in the Italian context. Social Indicators Research, VOL 121: PP. 291–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0629-3
40-  Karaś, D., Cieciuch, J., y Keyes, C. L. ((2014). The Polish adaptation of the Mental Healt Continuum- Short Form (MHCSF). Personal and Individual Differences, VOL 69: PP. 104-109.
41-  Lamers, S. M.A., Glas, C. A., Westerhof, G. J., & Bohlmeijer, E. T. (2012). Longitudinal Evaluation of the Mental Health Continuum-­‐Short Form (MHC-­‐SF). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, VOL  28, N 4, PP. 290-­‐296.
42- Lamers, S.M.A., Westerhof, G.J., Bohlmeijer, E.T., ten Klooster, P.M., & Keyes, C.L.M. (2010). Evaluating the psychometric properties of the Mental Health Continuum-­‐Short Form (MHC-­‐SF). Journal of Clinical Psychology, VOL 67: PP. 99-­‐110.
43- Contreras, E.K.P., Castro, S.E.L., Pacheco, G.A.B.P., Sizer, M.E.A., Keyes, C, L.M., & Medina, W.P.A. (2017). Reliability and validity of the Mental Health Continuum (MHC-SF) in the Ecuadorian contexts. iencias Psicológicas. VOL, N 2: PP. 223 – 232. Doi: 10.22235/cp.v11i2.1499
44- Guo, C., Tomson, G., Guo, J., Li, X., Keller, C., y Friedrik, S. (2015). Psychometric evaluation of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF) in Chinese adolescents - a metodological study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, Vol 10, N, 13: PP. 198. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0394-2
45- Salama-Younes, M., & Ismail, A. (2011). Validation of the Factor Structure of the Mental Health Continuum Short Form (MHC-SF) for Physically Active Old Out. World Journal of Sport Sciences, Vol 4: PP. 24–30.
46- De Bruin, G. P., & Du Plessis, G. A. (2015). Bifactor analysis of the mental health continuum-short form. Psychological Reports, PP. 438–446. https://doi.org/10.2466/03.02.PR0.116k20w6
47- Van Zyl. L.E.., & Rothmann, S. (2012). Beyond Smiling: The Evaluation of a Positive Psychological Intervention Aimed at Student Happiness, Journal of Psychology in Africa 22, 369–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/14330237.2012.10820541
48- Nemand, C. (2019). Mental Health of South African Industrial Psychologists: Results of a Latent Profile Analysis, M.H. [dissertation]. North-West University, Vanderbijlpark.
49- De Lara Machado, W., & Bandeira, D.L. (2015). Positive Mental Health Scale: Validation of the Mental Health Continuum – Short Form. Psico-USF, Bragança Paulista, Vol 20, N 2: PP. 259-274.
50- Joshanloo, M., Wissing, M.P., Khumalo, I.P., & Lamers, S.M.A. (2013).Measurement Invariance of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF) across three Cultural Groups. Personality and Individual Differences, Vol 55: PP. 755–59. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.06.002.
51- Joshanloo, M., & Lamers, S. M. A. (2016). Reinvestigation of the factor structure of the MHC-SF in the Netherlands: Contributions of exploratory structural equation modeling. Personality and Individual Differences, Vol 97: PP. 8–12. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.089
52- Joshanloo, M.,   Jose, P.E., & Kielpikowski, M. (2017). The Value of Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling in Identifying Factor Overlap in the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF): A Study with a New Zealand Sample. Journal of Happiness Studies, Vol 18: PP. 1061– 1074. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9767-4.
53-  Van Erp Taalman Kip, R.M., & Hutschemaekers, G.J.M. (2018). Health, wellbeing, and psychopathology in a clinical population: Structure and discriminant validity of Mental Health Continuum Short Form (MHC-SF). Journal of Clinical Psychology, Vol 74: PP. 1719–1729. DOI: 10.1002/jclp.22621
54-  Schutte, L., & Wissing, M.P. (2017). Clarifying the Factor Structure of the Mental Health Continuum Short Form in Three Languages: A Bi-factor Exploratory Structural Equation Modelling Approach’, Society and Mental Health, Vol 7: PP. 142–58. http://doi.org/10.1177/215686931770 7793.
55- Rothmann. (2013). From Happiness to Flourishing at Work: A Southern African Perspective’, in M.P. WISSING, ed., Well-being research in South Africa (The Netherlands: Springer.), PP. 123– 151.
56- Jovanoic, V. (2015). Structural Validity of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form: The Bi-factor Model of Emotional, Social and Psychological Well-Being’, Personality and Individual Differences, Vol 75: PP. 154–59. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.026.
57- Reinhardt, M., Horváth, Z., Morgan, A., & Kökönyei, G. (2020). Well-being profiles in adolescence: psychometric properties and latent profile analysis of the mental health continuum model – a methodological study. Reinhardt et al. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, Vol 19, N 95: PP. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01332-0
58- Reise, S. P. (2012).  The rediscovery of bifactor measurement models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47, 667 - 696.
59-  Rodriguez, A., Reise, S. P., & Haviland, M. G. (2016). Evaluating bifactor models: Calculating and interpreting statistical indices. Psychological Methods, Vol 21: PP. 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000045
60- Rogoza, R., Thi, K.H.T., Różycka-Tran, J., Piotrowski, J., Żemojtel-Piotrowska, M. (2018). Psychometric properties of the MHC-SF: An integration of the existing measurement approaches.  Journal of Clinical Psychology, Vol 2: PP. 1-17. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323560222
61- Van Zyl. L.E.., & Olckers, C. (2019). The Mental Health Continuum-Short from in Organizational Contexts European. Journal of Mental Health. , Vol 14: PP. 230-259. https://doi.org/10.5708/EJMH.14.2019.2.2
62- Peña Contreras, E. K., Lima Castro, S. E., Bueno Pacheco, G. A., Aguilar Sizer, M. E., Keyes, C. L. M., & Arias Medina, W. P. (2017). Reliability and validity of the Mental Health Continuum (MHC-SF) in the Ecuadorian contexts. Ciencias Psicológicas, Vol  11, N 2: PP. 223-232. Doi: https://doi.org/10.22235/cp.v11i2.1499
63- Brown, T.A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford.
64- Hair, J.F. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River. New York: NJ Pearson Prentice Hall.
۶۵- فیروزآبادی، سمیه و ملتفت، قوام (۱۳۹۶). بررسی شاخص­های روانسنجی مقیاس بهزیستی روانشناختی ریف در دانش­آموزان دبیرستانی تیزهوش، پایایی، روایی و ساختار عاملی. فصلنامه اندازه­گیری تربیتی، دوره ۷، شماره ۲۷، صص ۱۰۳-۱۱۹.
۶6- بیانی، علی‌اصغر.، محمدکوچکی، عاشور.، و بیانی، علی (۱۳۸۷). روایی و پایایی مقیاس به‌زیستی روانشناختی ریف.  مجله روانپزشکی و روانشناسی بالینی ایران، دوره ۱۴، شماره ۲، صص ۱۴۶-۱۵۱.
67- میکائیلی منیع، سمیه. (۱۳۸۹). بررسی ساختار عاملی مقیاس بهزیستی روانشناختی ریف در بین دانشجویان دانشگاه ارومیه. پژوهش­های نوین روانشناختی، دوره ۵، شماره ۱۸، صص ۱۴۳-۱۶۵.
68-  Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A. & Brown, G. K. (1969). Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory–II. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
69-  Chang, H. (2005). Dimensions of the Chinese Beck Depression Inventory-II in a University Sample. Individual Differences Research, Vol 3, N 3: PP. 193-199.
۷۰- رحیمی، چنگیز (۱۳۹۲). کاربرد پرسشنامه افسردگی بک-۲ در دانشجویان ایرانی. روانشناسی بالینی و شخصیت، دوره ۱۰، پیاپی ۱۷، صص ۱۷۳-۱۸۸.
۷۱- یوسفی، نورالله.، پیرخائفی، علیرضا.، و برجعلی، احمد (۱۳۹۸). بررسی ویژگی­های روانسنجی (رواسازی و اعتباریابی) پرسشنامه ارزش­های تصوری، روانشناسی بالینی و شخصیت. دوره ۱۷، شماره ۲، پیاپی ۳۳، صص ۱۳۹-۱۵۳.