ساختار عاملی، پایایی و روایی ملاکی نسخه کوتاه پرسشنامه پرطاقتی روانی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه روان‏شناسی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران.

2 استادیار گروه روان‏شناسی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران .

چکیده

مقدمه: مرور شواهد نشان می‌دهد که نسبت به مفهوم و اندازه‌گیری پرطاقتی روانی، علاقه تحقیقاتی فزاینده‌ای وجود دارد. پژوهش حاضر با هدف آزمون روان‌سنجی نسخة کوتاه پرسشنامه پرطاقتی روانی (پاپاگئورگیو و همکاران، 2018) در بین گروهی از نوجوانان انجام شد.
روش: در این مطالعه پیمایشی، 300 نوجوان که با روش نمونه‌گیری در دسترس انتخاب شدند، به نسخة کوتاه پرسشنامه پرطاقتی روانی و پرسشنامه رفتارهای سبک زندگی تحصیلی ارتقادهنده و بازدارنده سلامت ‌تحصیلی (صالح‌زاده، شکری و فتح‌آبادی، 1396) پاسخ دادند.
نتایج: نتایج تحلیل عاملی تأییدی بر پایة نرم‌افزار AMOS، همسو با نتایج مطالعات دیگر از ساختار تک‌عاملی نسخة کوتاه پرسشنامه پرطاقتی روانی، حمایت کرد. در این مدل مفروض، همه مادّه‌ها، ضرایب مسیر معناداری داشتند (65/0 تا 94/0). آلفای کرانباخ برای نمره عامل‌کلی پرطاقتی روانی 94/0 به دست آمد. روایی ملاکیِ نسخة کوتاه پرسشنامه پرطاقتی روانی از طریق رابطه با نمرات رفتارهای تسهیل‌گر/بازدارنده سبک زندگی تحصیلی سلامت‌محور به دست آمد.
بحث و نتیجه ‏گیری: درمجموع، نتایج مطالعة حاضر نشان داد که نسخة کوتاه 12 مادّه‌ای پرسشنامه پرطاقتی روانی، برای سنجش پرطاقتی روانی به‌مثابة یک کیفیت روان‌شناختی مثبت، در بین نوجوانان، ابزاری روا و پایاست. به‌بیان‌دیگر، نتایج این مطالعه شواهد روان‌سنجی مضاعفی را برای نسخة کوتاه پرسشنامه پرطاقتی روانی فراهم آورد و از ایدة استفاده از نسخة کوتاه پرسشنامه پرطاقتی روانی در نمونه نوجوان ایرانی حمایت کرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Factorial Structure, Reliability and Predictive Validity of the shortened Mental Toughness Questionnaire (MTQ-12)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Reza Rahimi 1
  • Ali Khodaei 2
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran .
چکیده [English]

Introduction: There is an increasing research interest in the concept and measurement of mental toughness. Thus, this study seeks to evaluate the psychometric properties of the shortened Mental Toughness Questionnaire (MTQ-12) for adolescents.
Method: In this survey study, 300 adolescents who were selected using the convenience sampling method, were answered the shortened Mental Toughness Questionnaire (MTQ-12) and the Health-oriented Academic life-style Questionnaire (Salehzadeh, Shokri & Fathabadi, 2017).
Results: The confirmatory factor analysis proved the same unidimensional solution, as in the previous study on adolescents. The unidimensional structure of the shortened Mental Toughness Questionnaire (MTQ-12) was confirmed. All the items had significant path estimates (.65 to .94). Cronbach’s alpha for the shortened Mental Toughness Questionnaire was .94. Criterion evidence for the mental toughness factor scores was demonstrated through significant correlations with health-oriented academic life-style behaviors.
 
Discussion and conclusion: Results show preliminary psychometric support for the MTQ-12 as a valid and reliable assessment tool to be used in research contexts. On the other hand, these findings provide further psychometric evidence for the MTQ-12 and support the utility of the questionnaire in Iran.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Mental Toughness
  • Psychometric Validation
  • Shortened Mental Toughness Questionnaire (MTQ-12)
  • Adolescence

مراجع

1-Denovan A, Dagnall N, Drinkwater K. Examining what mental toughness, ego resiliency, self‑efficacy, and grit measure: An exploratory structural equation modelling bifactor approach. Current Psychology, 2022; 15:1-16.
2-Kawabata M, Pavey TG, Coulter TJ. Evolving the validity of a mental toughness measure: Refined versions of the Mental Toughness Questionnaire 48. Stress and Health, 2021; 37(26):378-391.
3-Vaughan R, Hanna D, Breslin G. Psychometric properties of the mental toughness questionnaire 48 (MTQ48) in elite, amateur and nonathletes. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, 2018; 7(2):128-140.
4-Gucciardi DF. Mental toughness: Progress and prospects. Current Opinion in Psychology, 2017; 16:17-23.
5-Li C, Zhang CQ, Zhang L. Further examination of the psychometric properties of the mental toughness inventory: Evidence from Chinese athletes and university students. Current Psychology, 2019; 38:1328- 1334.
6-Rusk RD, Waters LE. Tracing the size, reach, impact, and breadth of positive psychology. Journal of Positive Psychology, 2013; 8:207-221.
7-Dagnall N, Denovan A, Papageorgiou KA, Clough PJ, Parker A, Drinkwater KG. Psychometric assessment of shortened Mental Toughness Questionnaires (MTQ): Factor structure of the MTQ-18 and the MTQ-10. Frontiers in Psychology, 2019; 10:1-12.
8-Meggs J, Chen MA, Hoehn S. Relationships between flow, mental toughness and subjective performance perception in various triathletes. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 2018; 126:241-252.
9-Haghighi M, Gerber M. Does mental toughness buffer the relationship between perceived stress, depression, burnout, anxiety and sleep? International Journal of Stress Management, 2018; 26:297-305.
10-StClair-Thompson H, Bugler M, Robinson J, Clough P, McGeown SP, Perry J. Mental toughness in education: Exploring relationships with attainment, attendance, behavior and peer relationships. Educational Psychology, 2015; 35(7):886-907.
11-عطایی فاطمه، شکری امید، پاکدامن شهلا. (زیر چاپ). رابطه پرطاقتی روانی و رفتارهای سبک زندگی تحصیلی در نوجوانان تیزهوش: نقش واسطه‌ای هیجانات پیشرفت و راهبردهای مقابله‌ای. پژوهشنامه روان‌شناسی مثبت.
12-Marchant DC, Polman RC, CloughP J, Jackson JG, Levy AR, Nicholls AR. Mental toughness: Managerial and age differences. Journal of Management Psychology, 2009; 24:428-437.
13-Kruger E. Mental toughness is a predictor of suicidality in university students. Education for Health, 2018; 36:42-47.
14-Gucciardi DF. Commentary: mental toughness and individual difference in learning, educational and work performance, psychological well-being, and personality: a systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 2018; 8:1-12.
15-Gucciardi DF, Hanton S, Gordon S, Mallett CJ, Temby P. The concept of mental toughness: Tests of dimensionality, nomological network, and traitness. Journal of Personality, 2015; 83:26-44.
16-Gucciardi DF, Hanton S, Mallett CJ. Progressing measurement in mental toughness: a case example of the mental toughness questionnaire 48. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, 2012; 1:194-214.
17-Tiwari S, Sharma J. Development and Validation of Mental Toughness Questionnaire for Volleyball Players. Master thesis, Annamali University, India. 2007.
18-Sheard M, Golby J, Van Wersch A. Progress toward construct validation of the sports mental toughness questionnaire (SMTQ). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 2009; 25:186-193.
19-Arthur CA, Fitzwater J, Hardy L, Beattie S, Bell J. Development and validation of a military training mental toughness inventory. Military Psychology, 2015; 27:232-241.
20-خدایی علی. (زیر چاپ). بررسی ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی مقیاس پرطاقتی روانی برای نوجوانان. فصلنامه روان‌شناسی کاربردی.  
21-Gucciardi DF, Zhang CQ, Ponnusamy V, Si G, Stenling A. Cross-cultural invariance of the mental toughness inventory among Australian, Chinese, and Malaysian athletes: A Bayesian estimation approach. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 2016; 38(2):187-202.
22-Clough P, Earle K, Sewell D. Mental toughness: The concept and its measurement. In I.M. Cockerill (Ed.), Solutions in sport psychology , Longon, England: Thompson. 2002:32-43.
23-Horsburgh VA, Schermer JA, Veselka L, Vernon PA. A behavioural genetic study of mental toughness and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 2009; 46:100-105.
24-Crust L. The relationship between mental toughness and affect intensity. Personality and Individual Differences, 2009; 47:959-963.
25-Gerber M, Lang C, Feldmeth AK, Elliot  C, Brand S, Holsboer-Trachsler E, et al. Burnout and mental health in Swiss vocational students: the moderating role of physical activity. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 2015; 25:63-74.
26-Gerber M, Best S, Meerstetter F, Walter M, Ludyga S, Brand S, et al. Effects of stress and mental toughness on burnout and depressive symptoms: a prospective study with young elite athletes. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 2018; 21:1200-1205.
27-McGeown S, Clair-Thompson HS, Putwain W. The development and validation of a Mental Toughness Scale for Adolescents. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2018; 36(2):148-161.
28-Nicholls AR, Morley D, Perry JL. Mentally tough athletes are more aware of unsupportive coaching behaviours: perceptions of coach behaviour, motivational climate, and mental toughness in sport. Int. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 2016; 11:172-181.
29-Lang C, Brand S, Colledge F, Ludyga S, Pühse U, Gerber M. Adolescents personal beliefs about sufficient physical activity are more closely related to sleep and psychological functioning than self-reported physical activity: a prospective study. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 2019; 8:280-288.
30-Sabouri S, Gerber M, Bahmani DS, Lemola S, Clough PJ, Kalak N, et al. Examining dark triad traits in relation to mental toughness and physical activity in young adults. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 2016; 12:229-235.
31-Sadeghi Bahmani D, Hatzinger M, Gerber M, Lemola S, Clough PJ, Perren S, et al. The origins of mental toughness–prosocial behavior and low internalizing and externalizing problems at age 5 predict higher mental toughness scores at age 14. Frontiers in Psychology, 2016; 7:1221- 1230.
32-Perry JL, Nicholls AR, Clough PJ, Crust L. Assessing model fit: caveats and recommendations for confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory structural equation modeling. Meas. Physical Education and Exercise Science, 2015; 19:12-21.
33-Taber KS. The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 2018; 48:1273-1296.
34-Reise SP, Moore TM, Haviland MG. Bifactor models and rotations: exploring the extent to which multidimensional data yield univocal scale scores. Journal of Personality Assessment, 2010; 92:544-559.
35-Jackman PC, Swann C, Crust L. Exploring athletes’ perceptions of the relationship between mental toughness and dispositional flow in sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 2016; 27:56-65.
36-Papageorgiou KA, Malanchini M, Denovan A, Clough PJ, Shakeshaft N, Schofield K, et al. Longitudinal associations between narcissism, mental toughness and school achievement. Personality and Individual Differences, 2018; 131:105-110.
37-Kline RB. Principles and practices of Structural Equation Modeling (2nd Eds.). New York: Guilford. 2005.
38-صالح‌زاده پروین، شکری امید، فتح‌آبادی جلیل. (1396). ساخت و اعتباریابی پرسشنامه رفتارهای ارتقادهنده و بازدارنده سلامت تحصیلی: چشم‌اندازی بر نظریه‌های معاصر انگیزش پیشرفت. فصلنامه اندازه‌گیری، تربیتی، 1396؛ 8 (30): 105-61.
39-Meyers LS, Gamest G, Goarin AJ. Applied multivariate research, design and interpretation. Thousand oaks. London. New Deihi, Sage publication. 2016.
40-Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. 2007; 934-940.
41-Hair JF, Black WC, Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. Multivariate data analysis (7th ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall. 2010; 125-857.
42- Arifin. WN. The graphical assessment of multivariate normality using SPSS. Education in Medicine Journal, 2015; 7(2):70-75.
43-Taylor S, Todd PA. Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 1995; 6(2):144-176.
44-Arbuckle JL, Wothke W. Amos 4.0 user’s guide: SPSS. Chicago: Small Waters Corporation. 1999; 240-260.
45-Stamp E, Crust L, Swann C. Mental toughness and dietary behaviors in undergraduate university Students. Appetite, 2019; 142:104389.
46-StClair-Thompson H, Bugler M, Robinson J, Clough P, McGeown SP, Perry J. Mental toughness in education: Exploring relationships with attainment, attendance, behaviour and peer relationships. Educational Psychology, 2015; 35(7):886-907.
47-Newmana NB, Stricklerb JG, O'Brienc C, Luid, Lynchc M. Deconstructing perfectionism in college students: Patterns of behavior, emotion, and cognition. Personality and Individual Differences, 2019; 145(1):106-111.
48-Trompetter H, Kleine E, Bohlmeijer ET. Why does positive mental health buffer against psychopathology? An exploratory study on self-compassion as a resilience mechanism and adaptive emotion regulation strategy. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 2017; 41(3):459-468.
49-Bucich M, MacCann C. Emotional intelligence and Day-To-Day emotion regulation processes: examining motives for social sharing. Personality and individual differences, 2019; 137(1):22-26.
 
 

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار