اعتبار‌یابی و ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی نسخة فارسی مقیاس کنترل روان‌شناختی والدینی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران.

2 استادیار گروه روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران.

3 استادیار گروه روان‌شناسی تربیتی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

مقدمه‌: والدین نخستین عوامل اجتماعی شدن کودکان و نوجوانان هستند، همچنان رصدِ حساس‌گونة نقشِ انکارناشدنی قلمرو مطالعاتی والدگری، در بین اولویت‌های تحقیقانی محققان مختلف، از موقعیت ویژه‌ای برخوردار است. در این میان، از بین راهبردهای والدگری متفاوت، کنترلِ روان‌شناختی والدینی به طرزی ویژه، مورد توجه بوده است؛ بنابراین این پژوهش با هدف تحلیل روان‌سنجی نسخة فارسی مقیاس کنترل‌گری روان‌شناختی والدین انجام شد.
روش: در این پژوهش پیمایشی توصیفی، 300 نوجوان که با روش نمونه‌گیری در دسترس انتخاب شدند به مقیاس کنترل‌گری روان‌شناختی والدینی (ژو، دو و پان، 2023م)، مقیاس والدگری توانمندساز (جک، سان، لوتون، چین و واترز، 2018م) و نسخة کوتاه پرسش‌نامه نظم­‌بخشی شناختی هیجان (گارنفسکی و کرایج، 2006م)، پاسخ دادند. در پژوهش ژو و همکاران (2023م) نتایج روش‌های آماری تحلیل اکتشافی و تأییدی در نمونه‌های مستقلی از نوجوانان، از ساختاری مشتمل بر 3 وجه القای ارتباطی، کنترل روان‌شناختی خشن و شرم ناشی از مقایسة اجتماعی، به طور تجربی، حمایت کردند.
نتایج: نتایج تحلیل عاملی تأییدی نشان داد، مقیاس کنترل روان‌شناختی والدینی با ساختاری مشتمل بر سه عاملِ القای ارتباطی، کنترل روان‌شناختی خشن و شرم ناشی از مقایسه اجتماعی، از روایی عاملی خوبی برخوردار بود. علاوه بر این، نتایج مربوط به همبستگی بین ابعاد کنترل روان‌شناختی والدینی با والدگری توانمندساز و راهبردهای انطباقی/ناانطباقی نظم‌بخشی شناختی هیجان در نوجوانان، از روایی همگرای نسخه فارسی مقیاس کنترل‌گری روان‌شناختی والدینی، حمایت کرد. ضرایب همسانی درونی زیرمقیاس‌های القای ارتباطی، کنترل روان‌شناختی خشن و شرم ناشی از مقایسة اجتماعی به ترتیب برابر با 88/0، 80/0 و 77/0 به دست آمد.
بحث و نتیجه‌‏گیری: در مجموع، نتایج مربوط به روایی‌یابی نسخة فارسی مقیاس کنترل‌گری روان‌شناختی والدینی، شواهد مضاعفی را در حمایت از ماهیت چندبُعدی کنترل روان‌شناختی والدینی و مفهوم‌پردازی‌های وابسته به فرهنگِ زیرطبقات آن، فراهم آورد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Validation and Psychometric Properties of the Farsi Version of the Parental Psychological Control Scale

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ahmad Baindrian 1
  • Ali Khodaei 2
  • Omid Shokri 3
1 PhD student, Department of Psychology, Bo Ali Sina University, Hamadan, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran.
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Parents are the primary agents of socialization for children and adolescents. The significant role of parenting in this process has garnered considerable attention among researchers, making it a key area of study. Among the various parenting strategies, parental psychological control has attracted particular interest. Consequently, this study aims to psychometrically analyze the Persian version of the Parental Psychological Control Scale.
 
Method:  This descriptive survey study involved 300 adolescents who were selected using a convenience sampling method. Participants responded to the Parental Psychological Control Scale (Zhou, Du, & Pan, 2023), the Empowering Parenting Scale (Jack, Sun, Luton, Chin, & Waters, 2018), and the short version of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (Garnofsky & Kraij, 2006). The study conducted by Zhou et al. (2023) utilized exploratory and confirmatory statistical methods on independent samples of adolescents, which empirically supported a structure comprising three aspects: communicative induction, harsh psychological control, and shame resulting from social comparison.
Results: The results of the confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the Parental Psychological Control Scale, which comprises three factors—communicative induction, harsh psychological control, and shame stemming from social comparison—demonstrated good factor validity. Furthermore, the correlations between the dimensions of parental psychological control and empowering parenting, as well as adaptive and maladaptive cognitive emotion regulation strategies in adolescents, supported the convergent validity of the Persian version of the Parental Psychological Control Scale. The internal consistency coefficients for the subscales of communicative induction, harsh psychological control, and social comparison shame were 0.88, 0.80, and 0.77, respectively.
Discussion and conclusion: Overall, the validation of the Persian version of the Parental Psychological Control Scale provided further evidence supporting the multidimensional nature of parental psychological control and the culturally dependent conceptualizations of its subscales.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Psychological control
  • Parenting
  • Psychometric properties
  • Validation

مراجع

  1.  

    1. Gao D, Liu J, Xu L, Mesman J, van Geel M. Early adolescent social anxiety: differential associations for fathers’ and mothers’ psychologically controlling and autonomy-supportive parenting. Journal of Youth and Adolescent. 2022; 51: 1858-1871. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-022-01636-y
    2. Yan F, Zhang Q, Ran G, Li S, Niu X. Relationship between parental psychological control and problem behaviors in youths: A three-level meta-analysis. Children and Youth Services Review, 2020; 112: 104900. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104900
    3. Yu J, Cheah CSL, Hart CH, Yang C, Olsen JA. Longitudinal effects of maternal love withdrawal and guilt induction on Chinese American preschoolers’ bullying aggressive behavior. Developmental Psychopathology. 2019; 31: 1467-1475. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954579418001049
    4. Yu X, Fu X, Yang Z, Zhang M, Liu X, Fu Y, et al. Bidirectional relationship between parental psychological control and adolescent maladjustment. Journal of Adolescence. 2021; 92: 75-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2021.08.007
    5. Zhou Z, Shek DTL, Zhu X, Lin L. The influence of moral character attributes on adolescent life satisfaction: the mediating role of responsible behavior. Child Indicators Research. 2021; 14: 1293-1313. The Influence of Moral Character Attributes on Adolescent Life Satisfaction: the Mediating Role of Responsible Behavior | Child Indicators Research
    6. Guo J, Zhang J, Pang W. Parental warmth, rejection, and creativity: the mediating roles of openness and dark personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences. 2021; 168: 110369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110369

    7.Yu J, Cheah CSL, Hart CH, Sun S, Olsen JA.  Confirming the multidimensionality of  psychologically controlling parenting among Chinese-American mothers: love withdrawal, guilt induction, and shaming. International Journal of Behavior Development. 2015; 39:285-292. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025414562238

    1. Fung J, Lau AS. Tough love or hostile domination? Psychological control and relational induction in cultural context. Journal of Family Psychology. 2012; 26: 966-975. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030457
    2. Yao X, Wu J, Guo Z, Yang Y, Zhang M, Zhao Y, et al. Parental psychological control and adolescents’ problematic mobile phone use: The serial mediation of basic psychological need experiences and negative affect. Journal of Child and Family Studies. 2022; 31: 2039-2049. Parental Psychological Control and Adolescents’ Problematic Mobile Phone Use: The Serial Mediation of Basic Psychological Need Experiences and Negative Affect | Journal of Child and Family Studies
    3. Shek DTL, Zhu X. Paternal and maternal influence on delinquency among early adolescents in Hong Kong. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019; 16: 1338. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16081338
    4. Zhu X, Shek DTL. The influence of adolescent problem behaviors on life satisfaction: parent–child subsystem qualities as mediators. Child Indicators Research. 2020; 13: 1769-1789. The Influence of Adolescent Problem Behaviors on Life Satisfaction: Parent–Child Subsystem Qualities as Mediators | Child Indicators Research
    5. Cheah CSL, Yu J, Liu J, Coplan RJ. Children's cognitive appraisal moderates associations between psychologically controlling parenting and children's depressive symptoms. Journal of Adolescence. 2019; 76: 109-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.08.005
    6. Zhu X, Shek DTL, Dou D. Factor structure of the Chinese CES-D and invariance analyses across gender and over time among Chinese adolescents. Journal of Affective Disorders, 2021; 295: 639-646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.08.122
    7. Fang Q, Liu C, Tang Y, Shi Z, Wang Q, Helwig CC. Types of parental psychological control and rural and urban Chinese adolescents' psychological well-being and academic functioning. Child Development. 2022; 93: 484-501. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13699
    8. Wang Y, Yu M, Zhou H. Co-development of mindful awareness and Chinese youth's mental health problem: based on parallel-process latent growth curve model. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2021; 295: 997-1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.08.113
    9. Chen B, Soenens B, Vansteenkiste M, Van Petegem S, Beyers W. Where do the cultural differences in dynamics of controlling parenting lie? Adolescents as active agents in the perception of and coping with parental behavior. Psychologica Belgica. 2016; 56: 169-192. https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.306
    10. Barber BK. Parental psychological control: revisiting a neglected construct. Child Development. 1996; 67: 3296-3319. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131780
    11. Smetana JG, Yau JYP, Rote WM. How do Chinese youth in Hong Kong evaluate maternal guilt and shame induction? Age, form, and domain differences. Journal of Youth and Adolescent. 2021; 50: 2096-2107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-021-01468-2
    12. Ng FFY, Wang Q. “Asian and Asian American parenting” in Handbook of Parenting: Volume 4: Social Conditions and Applied Parenting. ed. M. H. Bornstein. 3rd ed (New York, NY: Routledge). 2019; 108-109.
    13. Wang Q, Pomerantz EM, Chen H. The role of parents' control in early adolescents' psychological functioning: a longitudinal investigation in the United States and China. Child Development. 2007; 78: 1592-1610. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01085.x
    14. Zhu X, Dou D, Pan Y. Developing and validating a multidimensional Chinese Parental Psychological Control Scale. Frontiers in Psychology. 2023; 14: 1116625. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1116625
    15. Barber BK, Stolz HE, Olsen JA. Parental support, psychological control, and behavioral control: assessing relevance across time, culture, and method. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development. 2005; 70: 1-137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5834.2005.00365.x
    16. Sze NL. Distinguishing between adolescents' perception of parental use of intrusive control and manipulative control: Implications for adolescents in the United States and China. Dissertation. Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong. 2016
    17. Barber BK, Xia M, Olsen JA, McNeely CA, Bose K. Feeling disrespected by parents: refining the measurement and understanding of psychological control. Journal of Adolescence. 2012; 35: 273-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.10.010
    18. Li D, Li X, Wang Y, Bao Z. Parenting and Chinese adolescent suicidal ideation and suicide attempts: the mediating role of hopelessness. Journal of Child and Family Studies. 2016; 25: 1397-1407. Parenting and Chinese Adolescent Suicidal Ideation and Suicide Attempts: The Mediating Role of Hopelessness | Journal of Child and Family Studies
    19. He Y, Yuan K, Sun L, Bian Y. A cross-lagged model of the link between parental psychological control and adolescent aggression. Journal of Adolescence. 2019; 74: 103-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.05.007
    20. Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practices of Structural Equation Modeling (2nd Eds.). New York: Guilford. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 4th ed.
    21. Jach H, Sun J, Loton D, Chin TC, Waters L. Strengths and subjective wellbeing in adolescence: Strength‐based parenting and the moderating effect of mindset. Journal of Happiness Studies. 2018; 19(2): 567-586. Strengths and Subjective Wellbeing in Adolescence: Strength-Based Parenting and the Moderating Effect of Mindset | Journal of Happiness Studies
    22. Waters L. Strength-based parenting and life satisfaction in teenagers. Advances in Social Science Research Journal. 2015; 2(11):158-173. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.211.1651

    30 . Ardeshir Larijani1 M, Shokri O, Sharifi M.  The mediating role of mental toughness on the relationship between strength-based parenting with psychological resilience among university students. Current Psychology. 2022;  16 (2): 103-116. https://bjcp.ir/article-1-1959-fa.pdf [In Persian]

    1. Garnefski N, Kraaij V. Cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire – development of a short 18-item version (CERQ-short). Personality and Individual Differences. 2006; 41:1045-1053. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.paid.2006.04.010
    2. Hoseinabadi M, Shokri O. Examining the gender-based equivalence of factorial structure of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire- Short Form. Journal of Developmental Psychology: Iranian Psychologists. 2016; 12 (46): 199-211. https://srb.sanad.iau.ir/en/Article/1054743?FullText=FullText [In Persian]
    3. Reparaz C, Rivas S, Osorio A, Garcia-Zavala G. A parental competence scale: Dimensions and their association with adolescent outcomes. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021; 12:652884. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.652884
    4. Khodaei A, Rahimi R. (under review). Psychometric properties of the Farsi version of the parental competence scale. Journal of Applied Family Therapy. http://dx.doi.org/10.61838/kman.aftj.5.3.18 [In Persian]

     

    1. Meyers LS, Gamest G, Guarino AJ. Applied multivariate research, design and interpretation. Thousand oaks. London. New Deihi, Sage publication. 2016. Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation, 2nd ed.
    2. Rohner RP, Khaleque A, Cournoyer DE. Parental acceptance-rejection: theory, methods, cross-cultural evidence, and implications. Ethos. 2005; 33: 299-334. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1525/eth.2005.33.3.299
    3. Shek DTL. Assessment of perceived parental psychological control in Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong. Research on Social Work Practice. 2006; 16: 382-391. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731506286231

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار